|
 | | Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
|
| (...) Geez, I don't know if I can delineate them concisely, but they entail non-aggression, a respect for fact, and an acceptance that, lacking evidence to the contrary, this is all we have so let's all make the best of it. (...) I believe you. (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 0.987)
|
|
| | Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
|
| (...) Perhaps. But in all honesty, what are those values? (...) Look, I don't wish a "Theocracy" any more than you do. But I do wish a society where its citizens respect each others' rights. I believe that only a society that has a respect for a (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.987)
|
|
| | Re: Outside traffic
|
| (...) Yeah, I know the ToS caused some smaller groups to go elsewhere. (it's worth mentioning that some of 'em -really- miss the LUGNET interface/mechanics.) For such a case, I was imagining visual indicator of activity - like a meter or (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.987)
|
|
| | Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
|
| (...) and I honestly think that the envelope-pushing, rights-disdaining Religious Right will lead us to a theocratic dictatorship. Me, I'll take anarchy over that any day. ... but then, I'm a minarchist after all.. (...) Um, ya??? What was it you (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.987)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.986)
|
|
| | Re: Star Destroyer
|
| (...) Remember, the clock starts ticking when you open the box. :-) Sort those greeblies if you will, but by all rights it should be timed. I suppose extra storage bins should be allowed... (...) I think the ISD is conditional upon you meeting the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.986)
|
|
| | Re: Enter the LEGO(R) Design Challenge
|
| (...) i'm gonna say right up front that i've already submitted a couple of ideas to this contest and i need it to be clear that i enjoy a lot of the products that the lego group produces BUT does it seem a bit like this is a REALLY EASY way for tlg (...) (15 years ago, 27-Jul-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.985)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) First of all, one can try to get a receipt from the receivers mail program. This is certainly not fool proof, but if you get a receipt, the receiver has almost certainly seen at least the Subject of the mail. If you never get a receipt, you (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.985)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: control large number of leds (?)
|
| /* inc allows r bound and l bound(the search counters) to be increased with each cycle) */ float sleep time=.0075; print f("Neil Version 2.0n"); while(!start button()) while(!stop button()) light=analog(6); while(light<=VALUE) print f("On the white (...) (2 years ago, 20-Apr-24, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: Longevity of Potter?
|
| (...) Here is the original press release from Lego: (URL) I quote: The four-year agreement, which marks the third property licensed by the LEGO Company, gives the company the right to produce and sell construction toys based on the popular Harry (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Review of ME Models 550 (Car Transporter)
|
| LIST OF PRODUCT LINES AND THEMES ME Models 550 Town System / Freight (custom) Car Transporter Ages 8-88; 366 Pcs. (Truck 94 pcs; trailer 58 pcs., 7 cars at 30 pieces each); (C)2005; 12-page manual; 1 model (1 truck with trailer, and 7 car load); 103 (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.reviews)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) Just to let you know, this feeling is not limited to NELUG. In fact it is an international concern. If Larry were not an admin I wouldn't care, but he *is* and admin and therefore it affects LUGNET significantly. Unfortunatly there is no (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) I don't think that looking at only priveledges is a more accurate way to look at these issues. I think you only address part of the issue. The P&P and ToU already define everything as priveledges, but this means they can be taken away. Rights (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) That's mostly accurate, I would add "or one or more site owner(s) remove a staff member from their position." The reason it's stated in such a way stems from the current structure of LUGNET ownership... Todd and Suzanne are the owners of (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Because after the British "left" India, there were still a lot of Britons who elected to stay, and India still existed. Who would leave if "the greedy Zionists" packed up and "went home" to the places where they--pardon me, their grandparents (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) Well, as far as I could tell, the LPRV pretty much just had the privilage to see the document before it went into effect. And, I'm not opposed to that, really. I mean, I fully recognize and support the desire to strengthen a document before (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) For informal functions, that's probably a good idea. The LPRV, on the other hand, did/does have real power and responsibility: the power to change and steer and directly influence an important part of LUGNET's direction, and the responsibility (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) Another personal preference: don't call it a committee. Treat it casually. "We asked some people if they wouldn't mind giving us some feedback". Calling it a committee implies that it's a group with power and responsibility. It could possibly (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.983)
|
|
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) An excellent post, Dave. A few things I want to touch on - the Admins' basic idea of how the P&P process would work is essentially what you described here. We write it, work on it. Share it with a few people and get their input, get the (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.982)
|
