LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1801 – 1820 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Brickshelf scans - a couple of questions
Hi Pedro, or better: [ Ola Pedro, ] This is the readme file that was on a zip file that I downloaded from Brickshelf a long time ago ( when brickshelf had zip files of building instructions and catalogs ). However, I don't know if all rules are (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.db.scans)

all, rights
(score: 2.265)

		Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
I just had a brief chat with a German co-AFOL (named Juergen), who deleted all his pictures in his Brickshelf galleries in a very angry mood some hours before..... What happened? Someone with admins-rights at Brickshelf deleted the 'me-picture' of (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general) !!

all, rights
(score: 2.264)

		Re: time to get what we want
(...) MECHES? AFAIK the import tax on toys is only 17% (I checked it when I started buying Lego on ebay) hardly enough to explain the 100-200% markup we're used to pay in Israel. (...) I suspect you are right :-( The chances are virtually zero, (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.loc.il, lugnet.lego.direct)

all, rights
(score: 2.262)

		Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
(...) I am curious as to how far along that bill is. I would find it very hard to believe that Congress would pass that. Even if they did, I would find it extremely hard to believe that the Supreme Court would NOT rule it unconstitutional. Blatant (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.262)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) But if I want to say the official pledge, then by definition I have no choice but to speak the phrase. That's the problem, and, in addition, one's choice not to say the official pledge is easily construed as a lack of patriotism, which is (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.262)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: <snip> (...) Your Type is INFP Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving Strength of the preferences % 44 33 22 56 Dave K. If I were to guess, I would say that Dave! is ESTP, Chris is ISTJ and Larry is (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) Aren't we a little more mature than this? 'He who carries the biggest stick rules the sandbox...'? I obey the law because it's the law, not because the cops have guns. It's the mature, 'evolved', inherently right way of doing things, such (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) Apples and Oranges... In this one, a bonafide extra-curricular school group deserves the same status as any other extracurricular school group. It'd be like saying--'Hey you in the Chess club--we think you're geeky so you don't get any (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) I don't like to see John stating his own opinions as facts either, esp. when much of what he has to say is contrary to the facts as understood and accepted by the rest of us. The Constitution trumps all other laws. Even the preamble is not (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) You are plainly false. The state does operate essentially mandatory concentration camps for children in which statist and religious propaganda are administered to the inmates. Technically those inmates do have the right to not participate in (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
John: You are looking at past history and past rhetoric with blinders on. Part of The Enlightenment project was to break with the "divine right of kings." That's why there is language of that type floating around. I am not saying that there weren't (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.261)

		Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) I am merely looking at the actual documents themselves as they would appear to someone who wasn't aware of their author's intentions. Thus, I take "Creator" to be a reference to God, you take it as evolution (how inalienable rights stem from (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: Lego WTC (World Trade Center) Kit
Jake Rentar wrote: > This seems like an amazing idea to me, and certainly not far-fetched. I > envision a complete (or simply the two towers) World Trade Center set. > > When I first saw Spencer Rezkalla's WTC, > (URL) , my jaw almost > dropped. (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.dear-lego)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) What exactly do you mean by that? That all of yours are indeed fact? The FACT is that the POA stands-- defending it one way or the other is opinion. But I am willing to drop the whole issue until it is decided by the SC. But I know that if (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
I'm not sure why I continue debating here. It's hard to see all the sides of a person when the debate draws out like this. My initial reaction to this incident was based on a number of incidents in a very short time. In all likelihood I am (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) OK, so did you just use those two as examples of the hundreds, or is that all you've got? I'm not trying to be trite about this, but I think you could find more than two civil rights abuses in a year on any given year since you've been alive. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword (was Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!)
(...) Sorry, I did not mean to imply life is perfect for these groups - it is not anywhere near it. However, it has improved over the last 25 years in my view. (...) Yes. (...) I agree. I read this powerful quote in a Guardian letter today: "Beware (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Yeah, really. It's hard to imagine how they could possibly know that the sister knows anything useful. I mean, do they have video footage of her seeing her sister do things? Not likely... Also, I believe in the right to remain silent -- to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.260)

		Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
(...) I am only responding to this one part because after reading Larry's reply it occurred to me that this part is intended as a kind of snare -- frankly, a rather lame one at that. I am tolerant of others' views unconditionally -- that is to say (...) (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.259)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Thank you for the link; I'd never even heard of "ENFP" before, so it was all news to me. But at a quick run-through, the test seems problematic. Consider these questions: Q: You want a job or a career that offers you the chance to travel and (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.259)

More: Next Page >>