Subject:
|
Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:55:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
259 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-sept-11-legal-rights-glanc • e0905sep05.story
>
> Not particularly heartening.
I am curious as to how far along that bill is. I would find it very hard to
believe that Congress would pass that. Even if they did, I would find it
extremely hard to believe that the Supreme Court would NOT rule it
unconstitutional. Blatant attacks on freedom like that would likely start a
civil war. Yeah, there's something we all need. (Oh by the way, I was being
sarcastic.)
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
|
| (...) Actually, as soon as it gets passed, the Supreme Court couldn't rule it unconstitutional. They can't do that until it is an issue in a case they hear. We would have to wait for somebody to be arrested via a law enacted by that bill. Then they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
