Subject:
|
Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:02:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2182 times
|
| |
|
|
Well, it is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. I think that
legomodular could be claimed as deprecating a brand more than
LEGO(tm)-Modular could. Either way, it would seem very silly to have their
legal department crack down on a couple of their biggest[1] individual
customers.
Mike
[1] I would put Conan as #1, but I don't think I even fit into the top 10.
I think I sell as much as Frank Filz buys and I am sure there are bigger
fish than me, but I don't know how many that would be. Maybe I am a top
buyer, but I don't know. Just curious and not trying to fill some machismo
need.
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:Fs8un3.1JC@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes:
> > I think that Lego is getting pretty ridiculous on their protection.
> > Lego-modular describes exactly what it is. What else should it be • called?
>
> When I coined Legomodular I left the hyphen and capitalization out on • purpose.
> Not really sure why except it seemed more suitable.
>
> Putting the hyphen back in emphasizes use of LEGO as an adjective.
>
> If there is a problem with it though, you have to ask, is there then a • problem
> with Lugnet(tm)? After all, it expands to Lego User Group NETwork..
>
> I dunno.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
