Subject:
|
Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:40:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2807 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, William R. Ward writes:
> The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track
> Designer.
What does work is 1-13-3. It's close enough that Track Designer will
consider it a closed loop.
You can turn it into a triangle with a 5-13-7-12-4-5 pattern (starting with
curves and alternating with straights). Then it's easy enough to see that
it forms a lesser know Pythagorean triplet, 5-12-13. The angle formed by
short leg and the hypoteneuse is 22.62 degrees, which matches very close to
the curve track being 22.5 degrees.
John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
| (...) The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track Designer. Here's what I did: straight, curve right, 11 straights (5 switches and a straight, but that is equivalent), 3 curves right, cross-track. Then from the cross-track, a bunch (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
