Subject:
|
Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:54:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3497 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Holger Matthes wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Frank Filz wrote:
[...]
> I do not understand this way of thinking. If you do not have the time to sort
> out your pics or run them through a resize-batch process before uploading, I
> will not have time to surf and enjoy such a gallery. If the creator spends so
> little interest in presenting his/her stuff, why should the spectator spend even
> more time looking at the pics?
Hi Holger,
Don't forget that some users use BS as a storing facility for their own needs or
just to exchange stuffs with friends...and not for the pleasure of the
"spectator" you are.
But this thread is a great one and I agree most of the points even though I
don't care too much (the thumbs prevent me from clicking Bionicles things).
(I care with regard to save server HD capacity and cost for the hoster)
Didier
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
| (...) Yep. That's part of it. I'm pushing those pictures out in part to have an additional backup (I'm horrible at writing CDs for backup, but if I have a copy of my pictures on BrickShelf, on my work laptop, and on my home computer, I've got a lot (...) (18 years ago, 8-Sep-06, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
| (...) I agree. But there could be a voting without consequences, like at mocpages. One category could be "artwork and presentation". So blurry pics could cause a "negative" vote. (...) If the photographer takes both overview and detailed pics there (...) (18 years ago, 8-Sep-06, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
