Subject:
|
Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:38:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1816 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Chris Phillips wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:
| |
Hey all,
A couple of nights ago while trying to maximize the number of 2x4 bricks I
could fit into a cup in a far easier format than the previous record. I
found that I had actually beat the old record by quite a bit. The new record
is 149.
I hope you find this usefull.
OnDrew
p.s. post mod instructions:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=64667
|
Ondrew,
I just tried this. Pretty cool technique, except that I think you only get
125 (plus 8 1x4s) this way. It looks like you went two layers of brick too
tall at the top, (steps 15+16 must be omitted) so you counted an extra 24
2x4s that don’t actually fit into the cup. At least they don’t fit into the
cups I’ve been buying!
Still, it’s a nice technique because you’re dealing with one solid chunk of
brick which is probably easier to build and memorize than the layered disc
techniques.
Note: You have to wedge this down into the cup to get it in, but it fits
nicely and the cap does snap on.
- Chris.
|
I understand that you would like the cup to close but it is not a requirement at
any of the stores that I have been to. I sould know, I work at one. The only
rule is the lid has to be able to touch the cup in some way, shape, or form.
ondrew
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
| (...) Ahh, changing the rules on us, eh? Actually I was aware of this. I've been told by one of the sales clerks that I am the only person who he's ever seen trying to get the lids to actually snap shut. They always offer to tape the lids on anyway. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | Lid must touch Cup (was: Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!)
|
| (...) I'm kind of kidding here: Can you place the lid *under* the cup-- still touching the cup-- and proceed to stack the bricks much much taller than the top edge of the cup...say 3, 4, 5 feet tall, or as tall as the store ceiling? Strictly, the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
| (...) Ondrew, I just tried this. Pretty cool technique, except that I think you only get 125 (plus 8 1x4s) this way. It looks like you went two layers of brick too tall at the top, (steps 15+16 must be omitted) so you counted an extra 24 2x4s that (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
