Subject:
|
Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:17:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1497 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
It looks like you went two layers of brick too tall at the top, (steps 15+16
must be omitted)<<
|
|
I wondered about that also. I have only been able to get 15 layers plus the top
4 2x4’s in the lid.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
| (...) Ondrew, I just tried this. Pretty cool technique, except that I think you only get 125 (plus 8 1x4s) this way. It looks like you went two layers of brick too tall at the top, (steps 15+16 must be omitted) so you counted an extra 24 2x4s that (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
