 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Not finished with my Ancients Theme project, it'll take a while. I've even created a 2025 Theme into my whole collection, but even that isn't finished either. (URL) have more Ancients Theme soldiers though, its not just the Medes Persian ones as I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Why not do it on your own? You and the others have already attacked Richard and Pawel enough to illicit this kind of reply. Were I Richard, I'd feel the same way. Instead of unifying the community, you (and some others) are the ones dividing (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) We arnt TRYING to turn it gaming! Long ago, i had wanted to. No, we want to take the community to the next level, instead of keeping it just a little story-board basically. Why not have tips-n-tricks? Helpful articles? On-Line displays? Role (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
All you guys want to do with CW is turn it into a game forum, and CW was NEVER about gaming. That's what I don't understand. CW was NEVER about gaming. Never! I also personally find it annoying that no one has responded directly to Pawel's post (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) This is one of the most sensible posts of this entire thread, IMO. I'm not a Castle-head, but I've been following the discussion here -- half entertained, half annoyed by the level of whining I'm reading. In my view, Jojo's point makes so much (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Hello! (...) Of course the 'Castle World community' must not be confused with the 'LEGO Castle community'. There *may* be people out there who build castles, churches, medieval towns, chariots and battle machines or even just collect LEGO Castle (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle) !
|
| |
| | Re: The Thread is Dead
|
|
Richard, Alex and all: I think you all have valid viewpoints of these issues. I do not think that arguing will benefit lugnet at all. People have made up their minds on what they will do. Arguing back and forth does not change this, it only clutters (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Its a community! How can we be a community when there are cheifs that make everyone else wait on them? You cannot run a community by going by your leisure! (...) We had wanted to try to re-format what groundwork was already layed. Ihop said (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) No, it's not. I think you have some confusion between trademarks and copyright. The term "castle world" would not be covered by copyright. It has never been claimed (let alone registered) as a trademark until today, when you've tried to use it (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I don’t really care what you do. But it just might be easier to create your own if they won’t let you in. (...) And thus, “so make your own [website].” (...) !A community created by them... That gives them precedence, and control. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
At one point the professional artwork was created and owned by Craig Hamilton. I believe between the ‘group’ of them, they owned the artwork and existing sketches of TIOM’s intended map, and other aspects of their creations. Registered Trade Mark or (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I think this stems from the fact that there was discussion about allowing the evolution of Castleworld, but different people with different ideas about what should be done next, with their own individual pre-concieved ideas. You are right that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: What will Castle World be?
|
|
(...) Your idea is good in theory, but i dont know if it would work in practice. I think more has to be built then a couple of guilds. I think a guild should be for one specific type of Castle (Forestmen, Knights Kingdom, etc). In it would be (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Castle World TM? Since when? I don't recall 'Castle World' being claimed as a trademark on LUGNET before. It is not claimed as a trademark on the website. It is a term now in common use to denote a sort of castle community thing. It is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
_It doesn't belong to you!!! (...) They said if someone else was interested in it, they could take control of it. When someone tried, they refused. (...) Oooh, what if we went back on something? (...) Just leave, right, then? Go make a new board. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
What’s wrong with those of you who think you’re entitled to Castle World TM. _It doesn't belong to you!!! It was created by a group of old-skool Lugnetters, and it’s their baby. If you don’t like it…too bad. Create your own Castle World type (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
I (...) Trying trying! (...) Grid map would not be used for big lands, but for movement. Say, in a single turn, a person could do just so much stuff and move just so far. (...) I dont like the report thing. One side says that they win, and the other (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
(...) I recall an idea similar to that one surfacing with the earlier CQ/ DraKen discussions a few months back. The idea I recall, though, deals with reports of the actual encounter between both sides and the strategies used to reach the resolution. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
(...) I had several ideas the other night, just after I posted my previous message. Now, I don't want to get into the argument over CW -- heck, I can't even discern what the hubub is about. I just want to see a fun, relaxed community having some (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | What will Castle World be?
|
|
Ok - most of the discussion in the other post is getting away from the real point - the need for a new site. As Dave said - we need to figure out what Castle World will be. Here is one idea. If people like it, we could then worry about who will put (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
