 | | Re: the latest news —Thomas Main
|
| | | (...) I think both would be useful... (...) And the few times I have used the system...that's the way I've used it. I marked a few articles I read at "100" -- I don't think I would ever rate an article "0" though...I only rate things that I think (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: the latest news —Charles Eric McCarthy
|
| | | | | (...) I just thought of a way to alleviate this problem. Don't publish the average rating unless there are at least N values (N = 10?). If there are fewer than that many values, just say "insufficient sample" or something like that. That way only (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: the latest news —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that if N can be defined by the users, this would work well. I personally think that if even one person rates a message that some information is better than none. However that's just me, and I think that new users would like to have N (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Probably depends on how quickly they can rate articles. Through the website, it's a little cumbersome to give input on everything -- a lot of scrolling and mouse-clicking and waiting, etc. But using a custom newsreader client, it can be as (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) Apologies if this has been asked before and I missed it, but is this available? It sounds *extremely* useful! (...) Yep! Yep! Yepyepyepyepyepyep! Useful! Yepyepyep!! Yeeeep! Actually, if that included fuller search capabilities as well (date, (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Mine is a horrible hack crufted together to run in text mode with Curses on my particular home machine, but Jeremy Sproat has written a general-purpose platform-independent newsreader in Java, and I think he might be considering adding rating (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) If you mean that it would be virtually impossible for me to do some hacking of my own to get it working, or you're embarrassed to share the source, then fine! Otherwise, I'm still interested :P (...) Yup - these are cool developments, but (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) It's not particularly bad code or anything like that, it's just that it was an evolve-mode prototype -- didn't know Curses at all before digging in (still don't know it well) and wasn't sure it would even end up working. It also is still using (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Funky! (...) Yup - I forgot to mention that I expected no support for it :) In fact, if someone doesn't take up the challenge before me (I couldn't justify it until June, so it's likely they will!), it would make a good way to get a bit more (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Well, the Java client is mine, but I'm not considering adding a rating capability until after I can get posting to work (1). Dan is working on a non-Java client (Perl?), with which he does plan on supporting article rating. Cheers, - jsproat (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | | On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:07:52 GMT Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote concerning 'Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news)': (...) I'm still working on my perl/tk based streamer... it's coming along slowly, since work keeps bugging me. What (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The avid.cgi script is meant to serve things continuously, not backward in time, so adding the header to that doesn't fit its design very well. (It would also add load to it.) (But serving the ratings via something specially constructed to (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) No, you wouldn't be alone!! I'll join with Big Bird any day for those enhancements. -Shiri (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yikes, I gotta watch my wording. There's nothing to read between the lines there -- those are two separate statements. I realise that rating takes time and that not everyone has time or wants to spend it. (...) Intimidating was a poor word (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
