To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12300
12299  |  12301
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:21:43 GMT
Viewed: 
644 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote:
-snip-
It needs fixing.  I suggest that codeing'll do it, either as the person posts,
or as people display.  It's been done before in other areas and I think it'll
work here.

Hey Dave,
Thanks for the thoughtful responce.  The effort has been to fully enforce
incidents of cursing, regardless.  I've suggested a few times in enlisting more
people as 'Mods' for whom their sole purpose is seeking out ToU violations and
bringing them to Admin's attention.

The thing about a word filter is that it won't necessarily catch all incidents
of a curse word, in which case we are back to square one again: how do the
Admins deal with posts that break the ToU?  Direct post editting by Admins,
without user consent, is the easiest solution.

-Len



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
(...) That's my sticking point too... we can technically put a filter in place, but that won't stop people from going around it. If they are going to violate the ToS, they're going to work at it. It's more a matter of understanding that rules are in (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
(...) If the code puts ###@%% in for a list of words, then any word that 'slips thru' would be manually edited such that the word is now #@%#@#. The code'll catch the 95 percent, thus freeing up admins time for the other 5. Dave K (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote: <snip> (...) *cough* /toggle filter on *cough* ;) Yes times change, but what word out of Carlin's 7 is appropriate now to post on LUGNET as opposed to when they first came out? Simple--none. Not one of (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR