 | | Re: Spiderman Lego set list
|
|
(...) of licenses, but I'm pretty excited about this, if it turns out to be accurate. And tying it into Studios seems to make sense as well ... without the risk of threatening new town sets (such as they are) Hmmm, I reckon they'll use the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Woot! sig immortality! :^) Of course at this point all Harry Potter is, is that it's also just parts for castle. I personally don't consider HP part of Castle , Ninja was HP is NOT, YMMV. It just has yummy castle pieces :^) Mike (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
great page Matt! G Matthew Gerber <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GMFuJ9.8LJ@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
You're welcome Eric. Matt (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
While working night shift things get slow, So I start poking around the Web to see how far my name has managed to infiltrate the internet. When I came across this page created by Mathew Gerber: (URL) did'nt realize he has made this page and I am (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I think more important is the first bit from the quote, which says that LEGO owns all merchandising rights. Any company that wants to make Galidor toys, has to get a license from Lego. Which means that Lego is on the upstream side of any (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) Oooo...ooo!!!...!!! Okay, I have to accept that the classic Town, Space, Castle & Pirate division of product has long since changed. They are still around from the old Shop @ Home occasionally, but TLC did a NICE job on the new Alpha Team (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I think this means they have most major toy categories locked up (including the "action figure" segment). On the one hand, it means they will be able to stand out better (unlike the Bob the Builder sets, as I mentioned previously), but on the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I don't know if this answers the issue as for Galidor, but here is a little more info... (URL) the article: "As merchandising rights owner, Lego holds master toy and software licenses and is currently negotiating with licensing agents. The (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
Actually, that big Alpha Team base looks like it has potential to be really nice. Everything else looks pretty terrible...yeah, it's nice to get some of those SW figs in smaller sets, but can you actually build anything with any of them? Sheesh. Lou (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
I am somewhat disappointed by the Cloud Car. It looks like it is indeed all in one color, but I can't tell if it is original red or a new shade. The major disappointment to me is that they do not have enclosed cockpits. It appears the Cloud Car (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) As far as it goes, I think the Droidekas are quite pathetic. However grey battle droids will be nice for a change. Yes, I totally agree that those of us who are not Harry Potter Fans are suffering-hopefully temporarily! (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Yep, I remember that as well. Guess all the critics that this was the thin edge of a wedge were right after all. (...) Completely agreed on the risk. What a crock. I think the Bob sets will be a failure (or passable success) for the simple (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 set list on FBTB!
|
|
(...) I should have took that bet... ;) -chris (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Here's some more info I tracked down : (URL) in Humanacy -- how good does that sound!! --DaveL (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) What's wrong with that? A full-sized mini-figure torso has no alternate uses either. I really want a few of the new figures because 1) A new figure is for once smaller than mini-figures, sort of in-between "mini-fig" and "micro-fig" scale. I (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) I wonder about that every time I see a zillion of those sets still setting on the shelves. Could it be that, in order to secure the Spielberg/LEGO Studios deal, it was necessary to license Jurassic Park III? Is there any way to find out? Dave! (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Oh well... Just continuing the downward spin in terms of LEGO and Licensing. I remember when the Star Wars License was announced (TLC's First), that it was made clear that TLC was looking for long term relationships with products that have as (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Yep, looks like weird pseudo-torso pieces to me too. I wonder if they fly off on impact like the current Racers? Also, it looks like there is a back story, suggested by the background art. Does this come from the Racers software? (I've never (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) is it just me or do some of the racers have POOP bodies, with a minifig head? look at 4582, 4583, 4593, 4595 & 4582. 4584 & 4585 seem to have normal minifigs but those other ones seem to have a single element for their bodies. I like some of (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
