To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 6915
6914  |  6916
Subject: 
Re: multi train dogbone
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 01:48:43 GMT
Viewed: 
628 times
  
I like the angled sensor idea also. As for my delayed sensor, I actually had
two sensors and both had to be cleared, I figured the odds of two gaps over
the sensors would be pretty rare. Do note that my sensors were (are) Radio
Shack light sensors between the rails using the room light as a source, so
they are pointing straight up.

jt

--
James J. Trobaugh
North Georgia LEGO Train Club
http://www.ngltc.org


Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message
news:slrn8pgq67.cj.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu...
Jeff Elliott <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote:
(8 Inputs, 8 outputs, needs a PC).  My tactic was to angle the light • sensor
in both the horizontal and vertical planes.  It looks about 30 degrees • back
along the direction of travel, and about 30 degrees down.  That way it • can
cope with train cars using various heights, and it never 'sees' the gap
between cars; one car is always in the way.

Nice. The delay solution bothers me because: what about stopped cars?

--
Matthew Miller                     --->                 mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                    --->              http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux            --->               http://linux.bu.edu/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: multi train dogbone
 
(...) Nice. The delay solution bothers me because: what about stopped cars? (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR