Subject:
|
Re: multi train dogbone
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:46:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@(saynotospam)mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
837 times
|
| |
|
|
Jeff Elliott <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote:
> (8 Inputs, 8 outputs, needs a PC). My tactic was to angle the light sensor
> in both the horizontal and vertical planes. It looks about 30 degrees back
> along the direction of travel, and about 30 degrees down. That way it can
> cope with train cars using various heights, and it never 'sees' the gap
> between cars; one car is always in the way.
Nice. The delay solution bothers me because: what about stopped cars?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: multi train dogbone
|
| I like the angled sensor idea also. As for my delayed sensor, I actually had two sensors and both had to be cleared, I figured the odds of two gaps over the sensors would be pretty rare. Do note that my sensors were (are) Radio Shack light sensors (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: multi train dogbone
|
| (...) I've done this before in a rudimentary layout controlled by a Control Lab (8 Inputs, 8 outputs, needs a PC). My tactic was to angle the light sensor in both the horizontal and vertical planes. It looks about 30 degrees back along the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
