 | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Short answer: No standard Long answer: There is no standards making body. But there were defacto standards... There WERE two standards, sort of. PNLTC and other "non legomodular" clubs seemed to be working to one module standard. At least (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | The tables used by the NGLTC where built using the original standards published by the PNLTC. They are a bit narrower (to fit the mini van) but are the same height and use the same basic principle of connecting together. Only one table of the entire (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —John Gerlach
|
| | | | | (...) Ropes? Huh?? ;-) The GMLTC lets kids get right up to our layout. Touching is discouraged, but it still happens. Yes, we get the occasional *crash*, but we can always rebuild. We had a great one this weekend, kid got his fingers in front of my (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | | Wow John you are a brave man indeed. I have a hard enough time monitoring the trains, and keeping an eye out for run away toddlers (and if anyone has one they know that a couple of pieces of rope mean nothing), but having to keep an eye on the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | | Wow, I would love to see that picture. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Ben Fleskes
|
| | | | The PNLTC standard has been good to us. Transporting the legs, as James brings up, is a drawback, but they can be easily made with a minimal amount of materials beyond the scrap from the table top. And they are very sturdy. I've sat on the tables (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Dean Husby
|
| | | | | (...) Our group (The VLC) are about to meet to select a table format. We are leaning towards the PNLTC standard tables. We will be adjusting the width for maximum usage. I'm even thinking of bolt on Plexi glass to 'protect' our layouts. I've been (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) If you're a plywood club, you definitely should go with the PNLTC "standard" (there is more than one) given your geographic proximity. ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Ben Fleskes
|
| | | | | | | We use 1/8" thick plexi on the side of our layouts. It has several benefits. -Keeps straying fingers away from the layout. -Helps keep pieces from 'wandering' away. -Keeps the trains, when they derail, from going on the floor. -People can still get (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | "Dean Husby" <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> wrote in message news:38D99A3F.9ED3C5...a.bc.ca... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) leaning (...) maximum (...) several reasons. 1) We didn't see any reason to re-invent the wheel - I am personally not a big NIH fan. 2) We (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Club Table Standards was Re: New LEGO train realism? —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | The NGLTC is also looking at the folding buffet style (or church tables) legs, I don't care what the cost is as long as it keeps me from spending most of my set up bolting tables legs together, and it will make for more room in the van. Currently (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Club Table Standards was Re: New LEGO train realism? —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) Tom Cook, WAMALUG's resident builder of cool things, designed and built the folding leg system on our tables. Like I said in an earlier post, the tables are 40.25" to a side. The frame is made out of 1"x3" pine, with a 3/8" plywood top. There (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Club Table Standards was Re: New LEGO train realism? —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | Christopher, I'd defiantly like to see some detail on how all did the hinges with the legs. I'd love to keep the 2x2 legs I already have. So if I can find a way to hinge them and keep the same sturdiness, that would be great. I'm actually using 1" x (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Club Table Standards was Re: New LEGO train realism? —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | That's supposed to be "yall" not "all", dang spell checker! I need the southern version.. ;) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New LEGO train realism? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | Ben Fleskes wrote re th efolding buffet-table type legs: (...) Those legs are stronger then you might think (with decent fixings, of course). They are quite happy with a 280lb guy on the table. Mind you, if it's a long table, it tends to sag in the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
