Subject:
|
Re: New mod to double decker passenger train
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 00:57:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
836 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Larry Pieniazek (<388A44BC.CDEF4748@voyager.net>)
wrote at 00:01:00
>
> So I would say that given the exact same prototype, a 6 wide version of
> it that gets people to say "I recognise that" is harder to do than an 8
> wide version, and it is *precisely* because in 8 wide scale you have
> more choices, more possibilities to choose from to evoke a particular
> detail.
Ah. But there is a difference between 'I recognise that' and 'It is a
good model of that'.
Yes, you are right. It is harder to make something recognisable in 6
wide.
But it is harder to make something good in 8 wide :-)
(just conjecture at this point, as I haven't made anything, but it's
gotta be true :-)
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New mod to double decker passenger train
|
| (...) My point seems to have been missed here. The smaller you build, the more creativity is required, because you are more constrained. Microfig scale is very very tough and requires extreme creativity because you really really need to know your (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
