Subject:
|
Re: New mod to double decker passenger train
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 00:12:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswestANTISPAM.net
|
Viewed:
|
812 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> So in conclusion, clearly YOU don't know what you're talking about. As
> usual.
lol It cuts *both* ways. As you said, micro management requires more cerebral action
than building action. Building on a large scale requires cerebral action as well as
creativity-on-the-build action. Both are creative processes. I was simply trying to
win my point by saying that, all creativity levels being equal, the larger models are
more complicated and require more creative decisions, thus "more creative". Purely a
quantitative assertion, and half in jest at that. So lighten up, Francis;-)
-John
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New mod to double decker passenger train
|
| (...) My point seems to have been missed here. The smaller you build, the more creativity is required, because you are more constrained. Microfig scale is very very tough and requires extreme creativity because you really really need to know your (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
