To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 2882
2881  |  2883
Subject: 
Re: Building Bridges
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 26 Nov 1999 18:39:25 GMT
Viewed: 
3176 times
  
The two plates per track length rule is best, however my kids and I
have built (and kept) a pier set that changes one block (3 plates) per
track section ... it requires a heavy loco or a fairly short train,
but it does allow for a shorter bridge approach.
- Nick -

Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> 
> Consensus seems to be:
> 
> - don't change elevation by more than 2 studs per track length
>   - this avoids overtaxing the ability of the motors to climb
> - don't change the rate of change in elevation by more than 1 stud per
> track length
>   - this avoids derailments due to sudden grade changes.
> 
> Track Designer uses these rules when calculating bridges, etc. You want
> to use that to doodle before you actually start building, saves a lot of
> time.
> 
> Scott-A wrote:
> > 
> > I'm contemplating building a bridge so my train can cross over the track
> > below. Are there any guidelines for this. My main worry is track
> > gradient right now.
> > 
> > Scott A
> 
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
> 
> NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Building Bridges
 
Hi, all: I'm in the midst of a large bridge project myself. I'm adhering to the 2 plate slope / 1 plate rate-of-change guideline, but for other reasons. I'd add that you probably shouldn't climb sharply through turns - that just complicates the (...) (27 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Building Bridges
 
Consensus seems to be: - don't change elevation by more than 2 studs per track length - this avoids overtaxing the ability of the motors to climb - don't change the rate of change in elevation by more than 1 stud per track length - this avoids (...) (27 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR