Subject:
|
Re: Building Bridges
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Nov 1999 15:10:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com{spamless}
|
Viewed:
|
905 times
|
| |
|
|
Duh. I mean 2 plates not 2 studs, and 1 plate, not one stud. A stud is a
measure of horizontal distance, not vertical
(although technically they are convertable, no one ever speaks that
way... OK, 2/5 of a stud and 4/5 of a stud for 1 plate and 2 plates...)
I fell asleep in the Walmart line at 5:30... what can I say. Didn't get
anything good, either.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Building Bridges
|
| Consensus seems to be: - don't change elevation by more than 2 studs per track length - this avoids overtaxing the ability of the motors to climb - don't change the rate of change in elevation by more than 1 stud per track length - this avoids (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
