To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 2908
2907  |  2909
Subject: 
Re: Building Bridges
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sun, 28 Nov 1999 22:14:07 GMT
Viewed: 
1290 times
  
In lugnet.trains, James Powell writes:

The reason for the climb, btw, is that I needed to put machinery under
the track to support a lift-bridge that spans a hallway; the ledge is
5', and when idle, the train needs to allow, say, 6'6" clearance.  This
is simply too high to build a permanent bridge, so I've built a vertical
lift bridge to span the 28.75" gap that carries two parallel tracks.

A lift bridge or a draw bridge?


Lift Bridge.  I'm actually on my second version; the first was lifted by
long chain-link chains and powered from the top of the towers.  It only
carried a single track, and the deck was quite light, and a little flimsy.
I ran into difficulty with the fleixibility - when the centre of the
bridge depressed (eg: when the engine got there) the tips of the bridge
would rise slightly - enough to derail the car that was passing over,
at high speeds.

The current edition is very stiff, carries two tracks, and uses a rack and
pinion system at each end to crawl up the towers.




Another question - have people met with any trouble using a Mindstorms
unit to control their trains?  I'm looking to use one to control the
lift bridge, and I thought I'd dual-purpose it.  Consider that I might
be powering 2 trains over 4 power connectors and about 150 pieces of
track.

Why would you use mindstorms to control the bridge except perhaps as a aproach
sensor?  It's easier to do that with manual blocks, than with electronics.
Although, I suppose you could get it to work fine.


Largely because of the social situation - this layout is at work, and the
people there are more careless than I am.  They're prone to run the train
too fast, or run it with the bridge up (!), etc.  I want a fail-safe to
ensure the train doesn't go too fast, and that it only moves with the
bridge down.  I've considered using an all-mechanical system, but I might
want to use the robotics features later, to handle automatic stops, etc.


James P


Jeff Elliot



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Building Bridges
 
(...) I'm using strings, and have problems with them not winding evenly. This then causes one side or another to be higher than the other. End to end isn't too bad, but I did not leave in any way to ajust a single string save much hassle at one (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Building Bridges
 
(...) A lift bridge or a draw bridge? (...) Why would you use mindstorms to control the bridge except perhaps as a aproach sensor? It's easier to do that with manual blocks, than with electronics. Although, I suppose you could get it to work fine. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR