Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 May 2004 15:49:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
| |
No matter how long I think of this, I just keep seeing a Moontruck clipping
the side of a long ore-hauling car. Since December, I’ve always been
thinking of Space Train as a bunch of short, single-bogey cars that stick to
the curves really well, but if people are going to make full-length cars,
they’re going to overhang the curve interiors quite a bit.
|
Having short cars was one of the main ideas in the beginning, yeah.
| |
| |
Raise further and as steep as 5 plates per straight if the spec allows it.
You could have the space train acting like a big dipper through a crater!
|
It’d probably make more sense to run the Moonway above the modules and the
Space Train below them. Monorail is already perceived as being the standard
people-mover, with Space Train being more cargo-oriented (and therefore more
likely to be restricted to ground level), but Moontrucks also look like
they’re going to require a lot more vertical clearance than Space Train, so
running it over the corridor connections would address that issue as well.
|
You might just have a good point there. It would be nice to raise the race-track
but then we have to worry about running into monorail.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
