Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 07:07:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
388 times
|
| |
|
|
Me again. I was just catching up on the cool container threads that were going
on awhile ago. Jason, Jake etc came up with some really great ideas.
But this brings up a new issue. Most of the container ideas thrown around are 8
wide. This clashes with the plan for 6 wide trains/trams.
So what now? Where should we compromise? We either start moving track around and
expanding tunnels and arches or we make 6 wide containers.
I’d love to hear some thoughts on this from the people involved in the container
threads.
While we don’t need a container standard to mesh perfectly with Moonbase, it
would be very cool if one did.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
| Let's hammer this out for good this week. I'd like to put it on the Moonbase site soon. We'll work on width first. Look at this bad pic: (URL) Lenny has proposed that the train track also be moved to the seam between baseplates. I see pros and cons (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
