To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 18695
18694  |  18696
Subject: 
Re: DCC and the future
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:09:43 GMT
Viewed: 
921 times
  
In lugnet.trains, William R. Ward writes:
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> writes:
What I hope for in this and several other things is for LEGO trains to
become large enough to attract the attention of one of the model
railroading manufacturers. If Kadee came out with a brick which let you
use their O scale couplers I'd buy a bunch of them. If they came out
with a magnet designed to either mount under LEGO track (with studs on
the top) or to mount on the LEGO track ties (tubes on the bottom), I'd
buy them. If they didn't, I'd glue magnets to plates or tiles and be
happy. If someone sets up a shop to convert LEGO motors to DCC control,
I'd probably start buying.

What is the point of having a magnet on the track?

To activate the Kadee(r) coupler's Magne-Matic(r) uncoupling feature.

see http://www.kadee.com/int/c1.htm for more information.

But anyway, LEGO
made magnet holders with a 2x2 plate base that would hold a standard
LEGO magnet.

Which my experiments have indicated is woefully underpowered for this
particular task, as well as not aligned in the correct direction when placed
in the holder. Since the couplers themselves are magnetised (or at least the
gladhands are anyway) the magnet polarity needs to be such that N is on one
side and S on the other, I think. Maybe not though... Maybe I just never had
the polarity facing the right way, I dunno.

Your experiments may differ and I would be glad to learn that you have
figured out how to get the LEGO(r) magnet to work in this application. A
complete write up, with pictures, would greatly advance the state of the art
in this area.

They were used in the Ice Planet 2002 space sets,
perhaps among others.

Yup... MTron had some too, and I think the ISD might have some, actually,
not quite sure...

http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/10030-1 shows

28   73092 Black    Magnet Cylindrical (Ref)
14   2607 Black    Magnet Holder 2 x 3 (Ref)
14   30159 Tan    Magnet Holder Plate 2 x 2 Bottom (Ref)

no, those face the other way round... but could be made to work, maybe.

Good luck, let us know how your experiments turn out.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: DCC and the future
 
(...) Oh, I see. [...] (...) *My* experiments? NBL. I'm a LEGO purist, remember? I just pointed out a possible LEGO solution to the problem, but I see now that it won't work... --Bill. (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: DCC and the future
 
(...) What is the point of having a magnet on the track? But anyway, LEGO made magnet holders with a 2x2 plate base that would hold a standard LEGO magnet. They were used in the Ice Planet 2002 space sets, perhaps among others. --Bill. (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)

23 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR