To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 13528
13527  |  13529
Subject: 
Re: Digital Controls
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:36:23 GMT
Viewed: 
2008 times
  
Just redirecting to .trains

Pedro


In lugnet.trains, Dean Husby writes:
> James Powell wrote:
> > 
> > > Thank you very much, Robert.
> > > Do you know if anyone else besides Tom is working on this subject? I liked
> > > his page
> > > 
> > > Pedro
> > 
> > Pedro,
> > 
> > Feel free to ask away here if you want-I'm sure having msg's to refer back to
> > here wouldn't hurt.  I know there are some people who frown on it because it is
> > not a pure lego system, but to me, the advantages of digital outweigh the
> > disadvantages.
> > 
> > I have 6 motors converted, a decoder for a 7th is awaiting installation.  To
> > date, I have been busy with other projects around here since I bought the
> > system to really test it out, but I do like what I have seen.
> > 
> > I am using Digitrax (www.digitrax.com) equipment, rather than MRC.  The decoder
> > installation is exactly as per Tom's page-there is no need to add to it.  The
> > only thing which I am doing different is with regards to accessory outputs- and
> > that is to run a separate wire from the motor, using the electric plates cut up
> > to provide connectors to standard lego wiring.  The 9V output on the motor is
> > in this way available should I want to run a 2nd decoder mounted in a battery
> > box from a train motor.
> > 
> > Control is somewhat limited- the first 30-40 positions of the range are at
> > present up to fly values.  This _can_ be adjusted using a user voltage table- I
> > just haven't had time to do so.
> > 
> > To get started, you _are_ looking at fairly serious $$$, I have about $780 cdn
> > in it so far, for 7 motors.  (I actually only have 5 locos converted...one
> > double motored one...but, I _think_ that using the decoders in each motor is
> > better than a joint box, because that maximizes the "lego" aspect of it)
> 
> James, do you mean to say that you are actually running ~5 trains on
> your LEGO layout? That you are actually using DCC successfully? I've
> heard many people talk about it, but so far no one has posted pics and
> "Look what I did"'s...
> 
> 
> I've wanted DCC for some time. It's so 'real'.
> 
> Dean



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Digital Controls
 
(...) James, do you mean to say that you are actually running ~5 trains on your LEGO layout? That you are actually using DCC successfully? I've heard many people talk about it, but so far no one has posted pics and "Look what I did"'s... I've wanted (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.pt)

30 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR