To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 8649
8648  |  8650
Subject: 
Re: Different definitions of MOC(Re: New MF model.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:32:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1732 times
  
In my opinion, there are MOC's that are modeled on someoneelses ideas, like
star wars models, corvettes and airplanes; then there are MOC's that are are
models of your own ideas, the difference being that one is an exercise in
rendering and one is a representation of something that previously existed in
YOUR head only. To me its all about creativity, and modeling other artists work
is not as exciting as your own work as a matter of course. splitting hairs on
the meaning of MOC is irrelevent. everything you make should be Your Own
Creation! As far as Im concerned
I guess thats it, I like the things you guys had to say in defense of  this MF
model, See-ya later
Josh

In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Karim Nassar writes:
> 
> > It's for the same reason that
> > I'm taking a break from MOCs to build a large-scale B-Wing fighter model.
> 
> I take it you define "MOC" to mean something completely from your own head?
> Typically, I think of a MOC as being anything that someone makes that doesn't
> follow Lego (or someone else's LDraw, etc) instructions.
> 
> If you don't consider your B-Wing to be a MOC, how would you feel about, say,
> Shaun Sullivan and David Eaton's AT-ATs?  Lego hasn't made a model of them
> before, so they don't even have that to go on, although they made it from
> pictures.
> 
> And then, what about someone who makes a model of, say, a Corvette Stingray to
> minifig scale?  While they will probably try to capture some of the more
> evocative elements of the car, they would have to use less detail due to the
> size of the creation, so most of it would probably be from their head rather
> than from pictures of the cars.
> 
> And what about someone who makes lots of houses?  Certainly elements will be
> inspired by houses around them, but most of it might come from their
> imagination.
> 
> I'm not challenging how you define the term MOC... I guess I just hadn't
> conceived before of the different levels of creation when making ones' own Lego
> models, so it seemed really obvious to me that a MOC was anything you made
> without instructions... you obviously have a different definition.
> Interesting.
> 
> eric



Message is in Reply To:
  Different definitions of MOC(Re: New MF model.)
 
(...) I take it you define "MOC" to mean something completely from your own head? Typically, I think of a MOC as being anything that someone makes that doesn't follow Lego (or someone else's LDraw, etc) instructions. If you don't consider your (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)

17 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR