Subject:
|
Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 06:58:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1995 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 1999 19:07:10 GMT, richard.dee@virgin.net (Richard Dee)
> wrote:
>
> > He arrives at the duel on the scooter. No OB1 as he was in
> > the ship. What should have been included was an Anakin fig
> > with rucksack, but maybe they realised having 4 Anakin's may
> > have been too much!
>
> Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be
> about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine.
> Hence my confusion.
Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a
"triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two.
I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the
pieces that make up the vaporator most heartily...and it's even a pretty fair
approximation of the vaporators you see in the movie!
LFB.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| Now with added spoilers! (just scroll down, Gentle Reader) (...) *Sigh*. Yes, you're right. If there were some way to determine the result, I would bet money that TLG would still call a Naboo-confrontation set a "duel". Maybe they didn't want to do (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| (...) Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine. Hence my confusion. Steve (27 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
