Subject:
|
Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 May 1999 16:06:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1009 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 22 May 1999 00:35:25 GMT, "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com>
wrote:
> OK, let's put this to rest right now, for those that HAVEN'T seen the
> movie. The reason there is no second blade is that Maul didn't USE the
> second blade during the first duel.
You know, it's funny. I guess I wasn't using my brain right (even after
looking at the set), but I had thought the "Lightsaber Duel" set was for
*the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor run-in on Tattoine. It took
me awhile to realize my error. Even after appreciating the vaporator.
I couldn't figure out why Darth Maul's scooter was included in the set. I
was really disappointed there was no Obi-wan mini-fig.
OK, so I'm slow. That's nothing new.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| On Tue, 25 May 1999 16:06:05 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) He arrives at the duel on the scooter. No OB1 as he was in the ship. What should have been included was an Anakin fig with rucksack, but maybe they realised (...) (26 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| (...) OK, let's put this to rest right now, for those that HAVEN'T seen the movie. The reason there is no second blade is that Maul didn't USE the second blade during the first duel. (...) Wait until you see the Pod RACE - the OTHER 2 pods have an (...) (26 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
