Subject:
|
Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 16:36:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2442 times
|
| |
|
|
Now with added spoilers!
(just scroll down, Gentle Reader)
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 06:58:40 GMT, Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu>
wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 30 May 1999 19:07:10 GMT, richard.dee@virgin.net (Richard Dee)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > He arrives at the duel on the scooter. No OB1 as he was in
> > > the ship. What should have been included was an Anakin fig
> > > with rucksack, but maybe they realised having 4 Anakin's may
> > > have been too much!
> >
> > Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be
> > about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine.
> > Hence my confusion.
>
> Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a
> "triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two.
> I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the
> pieces that make up the vaporator most heartily...and it's even a pretty fair
> approximation of the vaporators you see in the movie!
*Sigh*. Yes, you're right. If there were some way to determine the
result, I would bet money that TLG would still call a Naboo-confrontation
set a "duel".
Maybe they didn't want to do the triel because of the excessive violence.
And because they'd have to make a new minifig torso -- one with a hole in
the middle.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| (...) Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a "triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two. I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
