 | | Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | Hi all! Yesterday I got 4 ep I sets from my aunt in America (California). I got the Lightsaber Duel, Droid Starfighter, Naboo Swamp and Anakins Pod Racer. I must say I am very happy with them. Heck, I must be one of few Dutchman to have these sets (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | [Forwarding to lugnet.cad.dev] On Fri, 21 May 1999 07:56:50 GMT, Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@globalxs.nl> wrote: [some snippage] (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3745616e.430313...net.com... (...) I'm on it. I've got the serated edges finished, which I will shortly post to cad.dat.parts for comments. It was a challenge to decide just how to model (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | (...) Can you package the hinges so they can released as primitives? I haven't checked all the sets, but I can think of 5 different hinge-parts off the top of my head. I have the feeling there are one or two more ... At least if the hinges are (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3745c9b0.163728...net.com... (...) to (...) The 6 parts I know of: 30364 Hinge Brick 1X2 with tooth holder (horizontal) 30365 Hinge Brick 1X2 with teeth 30372 Windscreen 4X7 Angled w/ (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | hey john, have you got the other hinge in a releasable state? can you post it to cad.dat? also do not forget to send toe 1 x 4 tile with 5 red and 4 white stripes to tery for the SW mini update. (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I got 90% through it last night. The area at the front where the "female" hinge slips in is quite complex, so it may take me a little while. The parts definitely look cool when put together. (...) Maybe I can get this one in shape today. I'm (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | i assume that the round corner tile from the front of the landspeeder is in the sw mini update? if it is not then it should be also the one part of note that hasn't been done (even in pock-up form( is the tie canopy. anyone want to consider a (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | | | (...) I migth have a go at this piece, it has number 30360 embossed in it. But I'm not starting right now. And although I'm aware that most of you are desparately in need for this part, I strongly believe that this part needs some of the new (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | (...) OK, let's put this to rest right now, for those that HAVEN'T seen the movie. The reason there is no second blade is that Maul didn't USE the second blade during the first duel. (...) Wait until you see the Pod RACE - the OTHER 2 pods have an (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jonathan Little
|
| | | | | (...) I don't have a problem with them making Anakin's pod one of the three. I think it's neat in it's own way (though not as big and showy as the other two) and it definitely has a crucial part in that scene. The problem I have is with them putting (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | Does the Sith Infiltrator contain 2 blades then? (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | Yes. Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@globalxs.nl> wrote in message news:374A59B0.6CE6DD...alxs.nl... (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep! (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) You know, it's funny. I guess I wasn't using my brain right (even after looking at the set), but I had thought the "Lightsaber Duel" set was for *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor run-in on Tattoine. It took me awhile to realize my (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Tue, 25 May 1999 16:06:05 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) He arrives at the duel on the scooter. No OB1 as he was in the ship. What should have been included was an Anakin fig with rucksack, but maybe they realised (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine. Hence my confusion. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:33:57 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) Would have been better. No need to buy a sub to get OB1! Plus it might have had some (though few) good architectural parts. (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a "triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two. I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Now with added spoilers! (just scroll down, Gentle Reader) (...) *Sigh*. Yes, you're right. If there were some way to determine the result, I would bet money that TLG would still call a Naboo-confrontation set a "duel". Maybe they didn't want to do (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
