Subject:
|
Re: Amidala and the mass-murdering sociopath
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:48:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
352 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, David Carriker writes:
> It kind of makes me wonder: What was he planing to do, if Luke had fallen
> and taken his fathers place at his side (Darth Luke)? It seems like he is
> out to make everyone in the Galaxy miserable. But what is his motivation
> for that? Mabye it's just that he is Evil.
In Roger Ebert's phrase, it's about the sights--not insights.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Amidala and the mass-murdering sociopath
|
| (...) Well then Roger Ebert can go fluff his pillows. There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON, short of outright and culpable laziness, that a film can't be both visually spectacular AND dramatically engaging, and there's likewise no reason that interesting (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Amidala and the mass-murdering sociopath
|
| "Kevin Powell" <kpowell@si-net.com> wrote in message news:Gx01G3.GIs@lugnet.com... (...) Using this logic, we could say that Amidala is responsible, from Ep I. She is the one that requests the vote of no confidence in Chancelor Velorum. This leads (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
