Subject:
|
Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:49:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
618 times
|
| |
|
|
1st rule: NEVER go by what you see in the movie!! In one scene, the AT-AT's
could easily be 100 M tall, wheras in the scene when the foot steps on
luke's snowspeeder, it is significantly smaller (to scale w/ the foot, maybe
10 M tall at the most....).....anyhow, according to the "vehicles and
vessels" book, it is approx. 15 M tall (20 M long). Anyhow, I usually go by
lego man height rather than width (lego men ought to look ata a strict
diet...lol...) to determine scale. A lot of the AT-At MOC's out there appear
to me way too large. it gives them more character, but they always seem way
to big according to the "vehicels and vessels".......
Jono
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) <fanatic level=almost_there> Very true. There's a lot to consider :) There are a couple key scenes to derive the AT-AT's actual height. 1. Luke ascending to the underbelly (there's a shot available on www.starwars.com) 2. The foot trampling (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) Actually, going by the movies, an AT-AT's about 75 feet tall, which translates to about 525 mm in minifig scale which is about 65 studs tall... But 40 studs would about work for the often reported 50-feet height of the AT-AT, though... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
