Subject:
|
Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:35:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
772 times
|
| |
|
|
If you consider that LEGO uses existing pieces where they can, I can imagine
each foot would use one of those tiny "saucer" pieces like the AT-ST foot,
or the Millenium Falcon landing gear.
Which would be fine, because if it were TOO big, yikes! I'd like it to
remain in the <= $100 range.
Well, I put an Imperial Shuttle on hold (last one!) so I'm off to get it ..
-Z
In lugnet.starwars, Edward T. Riddle writes:
> BUT if you go strictly by the fact that the foot of the AT-AT covers
> the Snowspeeder and take into account the size of the LEGO
> Snowspeeder. In order to accomplish the AT-AT foot being the right
> size it would HAVE to be HUGE.
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| BUT if you go strictly by the fact that the foot of the AT-AT covers the Snowspeeder and take into account the size of the LEGO Snowspeeder. In order to accomplish the AT-AT foot being the right size it would HAVE to be HUGE. This would also support (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
