Subject:
|
Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:01:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
479 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Brian Stuhan writes:
> Am I the only one here who LIKES the AT-ST? I mean it's not perfect, but
> for $10 it's a great set (and if it were much more, even as a better set, I
> probably wouldn't have bought it). I'm noticing less and less that TLC
> produces that I like, and so now I'm pretty much buying "good value" sets,
> sets that I think are a lot for the money, as there are few that I *really*
> like. I'm considering getting the other 2 smaller SW sets for 2001
> depending on what I get for Christmas (most likely the AAT or the MTT; for
> the former I'd get the carrier and for the latter I'd get the Droid Escape)
>
> Brian
I love it. I'm having AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, spam and
AT-ST for lunch. If LEGO can't give us the goods in the "way-over priced"
range of old, at least they are making a bunch of these "decent as a main
model but really good for parts" sets. I have for the last two years found
myself buying fewer large sets, more under $10 sets in multiples and basic
buckets/tubs. I end up spending the same amount, but I'm more satisfied to
have more of the parts per buck. Now if only I could convince TLC to make
sub-$10 Star Wars play scene sets with 3 to 4 minifigures a piece like the
Studio series...
Dream on,
Aaron (What's yer offer!?)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| Am I the only one here who LIKES the AT-ST? I mean it's not perfect, but for $10 it's a great set (and if it were much more, even as a better set, I probably wouldn't have bought it). I'm noticing less and less that TLC produces that I like, and so (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
