To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 10294
10293  |  10295
Subject: 
Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:59:07 GMT
Viewed: 
421 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Bryan Hodges writes:

So now I've seen every new set with the exception of the AT-ST, and I've
purchased every set with the exception of the AT-ST and Watto's Junkyard.
I'll get the AT-ST when I see it, and I'll get Watto's Junkyard (and several
more TIE fighters) after the Holidays.

A lot have complained about the AT-ST, but I think it's a parts bonanza.  Two
4x4 radar dishes, grey lightsaber handles, new round click-joint pieces, steep
slopes, two flashlights (I don't think these have been in a SW set yet), two
or more of those technic pin/stud pieces in blue, the cockpit extension...

Jeff J



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
 
(...) I think it's a crappy looking set, but I agree that the parts are great. I'm going out at lunch to look for more, in fact. :^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  7106, 7126, 7166
 
First off I wanted to say that I now have the Imperial Shuttle. I like the set, though I was a bit disappointed at first. I *HATE* the spears that Lego tried to pass off as force pikes for the Royal Guards, so I made my own... it's basically a (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)

26 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR