Subject:
|
Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:58:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
551 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Chris Gordon writes:
> CUTE??? Its an Imperial AT-ST!!! The designers designed it to look fearsome,
> deadly, and intimidating! Aauugghh!
> Ahem. Well I don't think it looks cute, I do think it is fairly good
> considering the price, and the fact that Lego Designers obviously aren't as
> talented as some of the AFOLs out there (No offense LEGO, but you have to
> admit they're damn good!) Of course, if I do buy one eventually, it will be
> for parts, because I think mine (tho its mostly black!) is better...
> Just my 2 cents [1cent in US$$ :-(]
Okay, I admit it. I like the AT-ST. It's great for parts,
and as a model it's not bad! As far as Chris's complaints,
remember that the unofficial name for the AT-ST after its first
appearance in ESB, at least among the fans, was "Chicken Walker."
I don't think it was intimidating until it was shot that way
in the Endor sequences, and even then only barely--so I think
TLG did an OK job. However, they could have engineered some
aspects better; one must turn the tan gable connectors upward
to get it to stand at a normal angle, and a turntable would
have been better than the too-tall "waist" analogue.
Otherwise, I'm buying at least three more. Not as AT-STs,
mind you, but for parts. ;)
best
LFB (who has his AT-ST right in front of him)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| CUTE??? Its an Imperial AT-ST!!! The designers designed it to look fearsome, deadly, and intimidating! Aauugghh! Ahem. Well I don't think it looks cute, I do think it is fairly good considering the price, and the fact that Lego Designers obviously (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
