To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 9905
9904  |  9906
Subject: 
Re: Star Trek: Enterprise
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Sun, 15 Jul 2001 01:39:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1034 times
  
In lugnet.space, Matthew Gerber writes:
In lugnet.space, Rick Hallman writes:
Maybe I am being nitpicky, but has ANYONE noticed that looks ODDLEY like a
First Contact ship? AKA the Akira-Class.

The S.S. Enterprise...
http://www.geocities.com/andrewbirch9969/enter2.htm

The U.S.S. Thunderchild, AKIRA-Class starship first seen in Star Trek: First
Contact...
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/scans/akira-cgi.jpg

Coinicdence or blunder?

I'd call it lack of planning/imagination.

We all know that the overall shape of the ships has to be
nacelle-body-nacelle for the warp field technology to work, so SOME
crossover is inevitable. But I had thought that the ship would look a bit
more...I don't know...ramshackle? Not so...current? Ya' know? I think it
woud have been really balls-y of them to make something a bit more like the
1701...bright white, smooth, less detail. I wonder if they have an
explaination for it...they would probably say that the detail on the 1701
WAS there all along, and we just couldn't see it.

Matt

I had the same thought. At least they picked on the more attractive
Starships in the Fleet. They could have used the Constellation Class frame.
Yuck!

Also one thing to remember is that the new Enterprise class would be much
smaller than the Akira class. Info that I have seen online about the new
Enterprise says the crew is about 200. I imagine the Akira has a much higher
number of crew considering it's as big as the Excelsior.

KZ



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Star Trek: Enterprise
 
I'm rather disappointed by the design of the new 'Old' Enterprise. It looks too 'modern' (i.e: it fits in with the designs of the Movies and Next Generation etc) to be a 'pre-UFP' ship. Too smooth, too much of a single intergrated hull design. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Star Trek: Enterprise
 
(...) I'd call it lack of planning/imagination. We all know that the overall shape of the ships has to be nacelle-body-nacelle for the warp field technology to work, so SOME crossover is inevitable. But I had thought that the ship would look a bit (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

29 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR