 | | Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | Hey everyone, Just found this new picture of the ship from the new TV show. (URL) The new show will be set at the beginning of the Federation of Planets. The Enterprise (NX-01) is the first production warp-capable ship in Starfleet. Read more here: (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) Hey Mark, Yeah, I saw the pics from TV Guide, and a few things on-line. Pretty cool stuff. I would really like to see some of the show bible, or any real background on the series (as opposed to the actor/production stuff on the Web). I'm (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree with you Matt. I've been a Scott Bakula fan for many years since the Quantum Leap show. It will be cool to see him play this role. (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) exist at the start of the show. There's a Vulcan on the crew, sent along as some kind of "advisor" or "observer", and a couple other aliens on the cast (the doctor?) but part of what happens during the course of the show is some of the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, yeah, that's what I meant. :^) Apparently, when the show begins, Starfleet Exists, but the UFP does not. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) Then I think that already mucks with the first technical manual put out back in the 70's. Yet I realize that printed matter is not necessarily canon, as per a Roddenberry quote[1]. At one time I would have considered that manual the show's (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) It seems to me that the time of ST:E involves Earths first steps outside our own solar system (warp speeds are only 100 years new to Earth, and speeds beyond warp 1 are new in ST:E). If all of the Eugenics Wars and WWIII are over and done (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | (...) It can be identified by its date, printed November 1975, and the volume seemingly has two covers: the inside tucked into the vinyl hardcover is a big red paperback with black printing; the black vinyl outside has a clear transparent front (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I too hope that the new series will show First Contact with the Klingons. Unfortunately, I don't think it will happen. According to The Star Trek Chronology, First Contact with the Klingon Empire "happened" in 2218. The new series is set (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | | | (...) According to the pilot episode script reviews I've seen on-line, the pilot involves bringing a Klingon pilot, shot down over the American mid-west, back to his home planet. Does this screw with the established timeline? Probably...see the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I have not seen that particular article, thanks for the info :-) I was hoping Enterprise wouldn't be "Voyageuresque" in the sense that they have one specific mission for the whole series. Hopefully, it will only be for a few episodes... If (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark D. McKean
|
| | | | | | (...) I have one. Found it at a library sale, of all places, about 15 years ago. And before anyone asks, no, it's not for sale. (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | more please —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | | this sounds cool plz post urls to more info :-) -paul (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | more please —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | | this sounds cool plz post urls to more info :-) -paul (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: more please —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL) some to help you get your fix. Matt (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Robert Paulson
|
| | | | | You shoud also note that someone entered a ship similar to this last night into my contest. Its called Galaxy Enforcer. I believe its on the 3rd page. (URL) Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B7748047.1486F%...ink.com... (...) (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Rick Hallman
|
| | | | | Maybe I am being nitpicky, but has ANYONE noticed that looks ODDLEY like a First Contact ship? AKA the Akira-Class. The S.S. Enterprise... (URL) U.S.S. Thunderchild, AKIRA-Class starship first seen in Star Trek: First Contact... (URL) or blunder? (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd call it lack of planning/imagination. We all know that the overall shape of the ships has to be nacelle-body-nacelle for the warp field technology to work, so SOME crossover is inevitable. But I had thought that the ship would look a bit (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | (...) I had the same thought. At least they picked on the more attractive Starships in the Fleet. They could have used the Constellation Class frame. Yuck! Also one thing to remember is that the new Enterprise class would be much smaller than the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark Chittenden
|
| | | | | | I'm rather disappointed by the design of the new 'Old' Enterprise. It looks too 'modern' (i.e: it fits in with the designs of the Movies and Next Generation etc) to be a 'pre-UFP' ship. Too smooth, too much of a single intergrated hull design. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Rolf Redford
|
| | | | kinda in topic.. anyone ever made a orginial enterprise lego ship?? ( or even any ship.. ) -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B7748047.1486F%...ink.com... (...) (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —John Harms
|
| | | | | (...) I just posted the first POV-ray rendering of my Klingon BattleCruiser to Brickshelf (URL) model sits on my desk at work. More renderings (and photos) soon. I tried an Enterprise once. Needed more Technics (support for dish & engines) then I (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Sid Mark Dinsay
|
| | | | | | John, Here's my version of a Klingon Bird-of-Prey... hope to see pics of your model! (URL) project: the Enterprise, NX-01!!! onedaycnn (sid) (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Rick Hallman
|
| | | | | | (...) be sure to make it Green! I love the use of the imperial logo as the torpedo tube. The impulse engines are sweeeeeet too! flick the swtich and you got attack speed! The disrubter cannons are sweet too! Can it cloak? ;) Rick Hallman "I am gonna (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Sid Mark Dinsay
|
| | | | | | Rick, Thanks! Scroll through my site and you might find a ship or two modeled after Voyager... and what does ACKUS mean? :-) onedaycnn (sid) (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Mark D. McKean
|
| | | | | (...) I made a pretty passable nanoscale Enterprise with only five parts. (URL) pictures aren't the best quality, but they're not bad for my first time with the digital camera.) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise —Andrew Summersgill
|
| | | | | | The pics are pretty cool actually, very clear - especially the head-on shot. And the model is sweet too. Regards, Andrew. ajs@blahblahblah.co.uk www.blahblahblah.co.uk ---...--- Mark D. McKean <qpanda@quantumpanda.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise (model) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) Here's a link to a pic I just took of my Enterprise finally with a round primary section. The pic also shows my copy of the tech manual with hardbound cover sitting closed next to the removable volume which is opened to the Heavy Cruiser page. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Trek: Enterprise (model) —Rolf Redford
|
| | | | nice model! heh can show how to build such model? this applies to the nano model too. that one is very nice too! -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Tom McDonald" <radiotitan@yanospamhoo.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
