To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 32774
32773  |  32775
Subject: 
Re: That old set FEELING...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.town
Date: 
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:42:47 GMT
Viewed: 
2443 times
  
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Thomas Main wrote:
   Talking about dinky, in comparison to 487, the galaxy Explorer is HUGE.


Uh, actually I’ve just realised that I was mistaken as to the definition of the word dinky. I didn’t realise it meant small or insignificant. What I meant was it looked like an old-fashioned toy, like a Dinky(TM) Toy.

Snip
  

Cheers,



Hey Paul,

Thanks for posting this picture. When I first saw it I was amused by the ‘armoured” car having the occupants so exposed. Later, I noticed that the box proclaims(1) that it was designed by Gerry Anderson and that he was responsible for Thunderbirds, Space 1999, and UFO, so it was nice to have another wave of nostalgia. I never saw one of these toys though; what few Dinky Toys we encountered were ordinary cars and trucks.

I thought others might be interested in Gerry Anderson’s bio, as you may also be unaware of the connections: more about him.

This brings me to another point about nostalgia. Keep in mind how old we were when a particular set was the coolest thing in the world. Your 10 year old self had a different point of view than your adult self. I remember seeing Thunderbirds when I was a child, and then when I saw a bit of the show a few years ago, I was surprised to see that they used marrionettes rather than people. I hadn’t noticed that as a child.

So, I’m cutting a little slack for the inner child...

Peace and dim recollections,

Professor Whateverly




(1) Yeah, it’s a little tricky to read, all it takes is a little image enhancement...



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: That old set FEELING...
 
(...) Uh, actually I've just realised that I was mistaken as to the definition of the word dinky. I didn't realise it meant small or insignificant. What I meant was it looked like an old-fashioned toy, like a Dinky(TM) Toy. (2 URLs) Cheers, (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.town, FTX)

19 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR