Subject:
|
Re: Minifig Scales
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:45:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
551 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I don’t really like the “it’s only a movie” excuse because it lets the
writers off the hook too easily. A better phrasing might be “because it
advances the plot more effectively,” but even that excuse invites all kinds
of inconsistencies.
Dave!
|
I’ll try that one next time my kids ask “why” a talking animal in an animated
does something that makes no sense (for us humans, at least). Like, “How come
Dory can’t remember stuff?” (from our trip to “Finding Nemo”) :-)
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Minifig Scales
|
| (...) I find that children respond very well to the particulars of abstract literary theory. Then you can move them onto questions about how the voiceover actor in one film can be a different character in another film. Oh, the fun to be had! Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Minifig Scales
|
| (...) Nuts to that! How the heck did they breathe? Presumably the out-of-phase air would go right through them. I don't really like the "it's only a movie" excuse because it lets the writers off the hook too easily. A better phrasing might be (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
