To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 1953
1952  |  1954
Subject: 
Re: More previews from BCS
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:39:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1849 times
  
--


Paul Davidson, aka Tinman
www.theforce.net |  Your Daily Dose of Star Wars
www.filmforce.net |  Your Daily Dose of Film News


> The different sections of the ship are very sturdy.  I have had no • problems
> with cave-ins or anything (without the removable floors insalled, the ship • is
> essentially hollow) but there is no way I could lift it all as one peice.
> I have no way to weigh it right now, but I am confident it would be at • least
> 60 or 70 pounds with all the inner walls installed.
> It is well over 7 feet long so I made it modular, so that it comes apart • in 3
> main sections.

My own current capital ship (the "Nautilus",
www.theforce.net/tinman/nautilus) is about three feet long and at least a
foot wide.  About half my construction time so far, though, has spent
building a sturdy base of interlocking technic beams and plates.  With the
heavy bridge and one-and-a-half decks built so far, it is still able to
support the weight easily.  I imagine that this must be four times as hard
to do with a ship twice the length, though.

> The front section splits apart with hinges so that the bay can be accessed • (I
> will eventually have pictures of this) and the white half-cylinders on the
> sides of the crew section also pop off to access the rear of the ship.
> The white section on top of the ship also lifts off and the second story
> seperates so both levels are accessable.  The black roof of the control • room
> also lifts off.

The Nautilus is designed with 3.5 levels and a foreward detachable
two-story-high bridge.  Every deck is composed simply of 4 to 6 modular
pieces that slide into the frame of the ship...It is yet to be seen how that
will affect the structure's strength.

> I wish I could say otherwise, but this ship rates a solid zero on the • Whoosh-
> Factor scale.  (Unless you run past it really quickly)
> 
> I know this is going to sound nuts, but the next capital ship I am • building
> will be quite a bit bulkier and probably longer.  I only used 3/4th of my • blue
> and black bricks for this project.  My next ship will incorporate more • color,
> too.  But that is still months away from completion, so I will shut up • about
> it  :)

Can't wait... :)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More previews from BCS
 
(...) actually, the main reason I had to make it modular is because of the center "neck" section. With two huge bulky ends attached to it, I'm sure it would break if I tried to lift it. This is the reason my next ship will be more solid. The (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More previews from BCS
 
(...) Thanks! The different sections of the ship are very sturdy. I have had no problems with cave-ins or anything (without the removable floors insalled, the ship is essentially hollow) but there is no way I could lift it all as one peice. I have (...) (26 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)

19 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR