Subject:
|
Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 22:55:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1171 times
|
| |
|
|
I saw it with two friends (who happen to be professional [and _published_] Sci-
Fi writers), and we ragged on the movie the entire way through. (We saw it at
a local brew/bar-theatre, so that didn't help any.) Most of the people around
us were paying more attention to us poke gaping holes in the film than to the
film itself.
-Cheese
In lugnet.space, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.space, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > Matthew Wilkins wrote:
> > >
> > > Was it as bad as "Armageddon" (or, "One Problem After Another", OR "Will
> > > NOTHING Ever Go Right?")?
> >
> > Hmm... I liked Armageddon, you knew that was fake, I think Mission to
> > Mars (MTM?) just tried to combine reality with fiction too much, and it
> > ended up being a really unenjoyable movie.
>
>
>
> I just back-spaced over my views on Armegeddon. Let's just say I rated it as
> the most determinedly stupid movie of all time.
> _
> From everything I hear, there is a new champ. :-O
> -
>
> Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
| At first I wanted to see this. Then, after reading review after review, I decided not to. And then, after reading about it in this group, I think Barbara and I will see it. Heck, we laughed all the way through _Lost World_, and rolled on the floor (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: (Movie) Mission to Mars
|
| (...) I just back-spaced over my views on Armegeddon. Let's just say I rated it as the most determinedly stupid movie of all time. _ From everything I hear, there is a new champ. :-O - Bruce (24 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.space)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
