 | | A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | I would like to know if anyone is interested in collaborating on a HUGE starship MOC. The way it would works is this: I would sketch out a design on paper, and post to an internet site of my own. I would then divide it into sections by function, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Nicole Drumm
|
| | | | | "david" <raptor222_@excite.com> wrote in message news:GyuoBt.4sC@lugnet.com... (...) Well you had me onboard til you said LDRAW. Ive just started to learn its use. My "test" modle is only two parts. (...) -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Tim Romine
|
| | | | | (...) WOW!!!!! This sounds like something I *definitely* want to get in on! The only cautions I would state, are that the approximate scale and connections (studs only, TECHNIC-style pins, etc.) would have to be decided on, so the separate sections (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | Tim Romine <enimor7@juno.com> wrote in message news:Gyuzu3.498@lugnet.com... (...) decided (...) which (...) You are one step ahead of me with the connection issue, good job. As for the color scheme I thought we would let all involved have some (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Tim Romine
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.space, David Sinn writes: <snip> (...) Sounds good, so far. As to the connection issue, how about creating a basic framework to start with? Maybe some technic beams or just plain bricks with pins or something to show attachment points for (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | (...) basic (...) with (...) up (...) You are one step ahead of me again. :-) I was thinking last night that I would build a frame work to show how everything works. (...) I like it. (...) I love the feedback keep it coming. D. Sinn (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Jason S. Mantor
|
| | | | | Sounds Cool. I was bummed that the "Group Build" (See link) didn't get further than it did... Count me in : ) -JSM (URL) <raptor222_@excite.com> wrote in message news:GyuoBt.4sC@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | david <raptor222_@excite.com> wrote in message news:GyuoBt.4sC@lugnet.com... (...) Good news: someone has volunteered to help with the website as I am not very good at it yet. His name is Ken Cefaratti Lugnet member #1200. D. Sinn (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | david <raptor222_@excite.com> wrote in message news:GyuoBt.4sC@lugnet.com... (...) How about we take one of Karim Nasser's excellent designs and scale then up to minifig size? (URL) rough scale might be 1:6. (i.e. one stud on the little ship equals (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Tim Romine
|
| | | | | | (...) potential of raytracing as an end-result to LEGO CAD. Of course, I refuse to use his work if we can't obtain his permission, though. This sounds like a great place to start. I think it would give us a general framework, as well as logical (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | (...) I await your recommendation XO. : ) D. Sinn (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Tim Romine
|
| | | | | | (...) Wow, you honor me with the rank. Thanks! After carefully inspecting flight decks from the capital ships section of Pallas Spaceworks, I think the practical scale of translation would be 12:1. I realize this would make the project, well, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Tim Romine
|
| | | | | | Whoops! Three errors to report! I just checked the scale factor again, and we should build at 20:1 for the sake of support vehicles (That Chevron Bomber is REALLY big!) and at least 10:1 for the non-support vhicle ships, although I would prefer 20:1 (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | I like 1:10 for the Intrepid it makes it big but keeps it small enough to stay with the spirit of Pallas' smaller ships. As for the .dat files give me your email and I'll send the whole bunch in a .zip file. Just so you know XO is not honory you (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Curt Tigges
|
| | | | | (...) I know i'm a little late, but i'd also be interested in participating in this project. My only question is: Can a huge starship be built (once we all compine our setions) in MLCAD? I thought that only medium sized MOCs could be made in MLCAD. (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | | (...) all (...) It's good to have you involved. I don't know about any limits but if it won't work we will go as far as possible. D. Sinn "Where ever you go there you are" (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Mark Nelson
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, with the Wurmhold Citadel, I know the walls were over 12,000 peices alone. I'm not sure what the count was with the Central Citadel added. And that was on a 400 mhz computer. So MLCad can support some pretty large workloads. -- Mark (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | | (...) That sounds interesting. When are you going to get a website for this, and/or scetch out the design? -JHK (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | (...) I'll be using my new brickshelf account as the website. My XO and I are throwing out some ideas of using Pallas Spaceworks Intrepid or Stormer class escorts. (URL) Sinn raptor222_@excite.com "Da plane boss, da plane" (22 years ago, 18-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Jeffrey M. Szklennik
|
| | | | | (...) here's my idea for a universal docking port if it helps: (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | | | (...) Thank you it may prove useful. D. Sinn (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —Greg Howell
|
| | | | (...) Interesting... Are you thinking we each make individual sections that fit into the whole, or are these sections just going to snap on to the spine of the ship ala the space station project. If you are going to base this on a set design, then (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A massive undertaking —David Sinn
|
| | | | (...) For some parts, yes. (...) making (...) save (...) This will be the majority of the construction D. Sinn (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
