 | | Re: Visual NQC 2001 final version
|
|
The site was blocked because of to many traffic till the end of april. You can access the site normaly now. (May 1st) Ronald Strijbosch (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
(...) When we were working on setting up independently controlled LEGO bots we found this site: (URL) is a program to download which uses standard gamepad controllers as inputs and sends IR signals out through a single LEGO IR tower to control up to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001 final version
|
|
Has anyone else run into the problem of the website *NOT* being there? I click on the link below and I get an error is some other language saying that the site is *NOT* available. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
(...) Aluminum foil wrapped around the RCX works... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
(...) This is a very basic problem with the whole LEGO IR protocol -- you can't address a specific RCX/Scout without also reaching every other brick in the room. I believe this is the reason why the RCX has the short-range IR setting. The approach I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
Let me clarify. although it still may not be possible, I just want to create 2 lego BattleBot like robots. A Scout based bot being controlled by one person with the Lego Remote and a Second bot being controlled via RCX to RCX like in the Lego (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
Hi Stephen, you will not have success with this approach, because the LEGO firmware has no collision detection (especially no collision avoidance !) for their IR protocol. So if you're using more than 2 IR devices with LEGO firmware you will receive (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another RcxCC revision
|
|
(...) non-functional at the moment. Thanks to Shane Seward for reporting it. I've fixed it but I won't have a new release up on my website for another day or two. For now you can work around the problem by using the command-line parameters or by (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | MindScope, watch sensors/vars/timers in a graph
|
|
hi All, I build an extended PC-scope to watch sensors ans local variables in the RCX. The basic idea came from the program "Mr. Sensor" build by Michael Gasperi. (URL) Mientki (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Blocking The Lego Remote?
|
|
Problem: I Have 2 Lego RCX's 1 Lego Scout and a Lego Remote. I want to build and operate 2 robots at the same time. One robot out of the Scout being remotely controlled by the Lego IR Remote and the Other with 1 RCX being controlled remotely via IR (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Yet another RcxCC revision
|
|
Okay, thanks to the input from some of you who have tried my revised RcxCC I have recently fixed a few bugs and added a few more user-configurable options. Find the latest revision to RcxCC at: (URL) this version you'll find: 1) Fixed the NQC (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Visual NQC 2001 final version
|
|
CHECK THIS OUT!! The final version of Visual NQC 2001 is available now on (URL) this moment only the English version is available for download but the Dutch and German versions will come soon. For more information about new features see News on the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Hmmm, it seems to be correctly passing -TRCX2 on the command line in my testing. I haven't actually tested with a brick containing the RCX2 firmware, but when I put an RCX2-only command in a program it compiles fine when I've selected RCX2 but (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) With the amount of work you have put in on this it should be I who apologizes for pestering you. I tried the most recent version. It is correctly finding the nqc compiler now. Unfortunately it doesn't appear to be passing the correct command (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Whoops. I was assuming that since Mark's version put NQC in the same directory as RcxCC everyone was using the NQC in the same directory. I hadn't tried it differently myself. So in one of my past revisions I stuck a path on the front of the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Hi John, I just downloaded the 'latest' version, RcxCC.exe is timestamped 4/16/01 5:23pm. It looks like this version, like the one immediatly before it, requires that nqc.exe is in the same directory as rcxcc.exe. With previous versions of (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Dean, I may have broken something in RcxCC related to running NQC. I'll take out the code I put in that pops up that error message and, with any luck, things will be back to normal. The odd thing is I can't figure out the conditions that make (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
I feel pretty stupid asking this question, but I can't seem to solve the problem myself. When I try to compile a program using John's RcxCC tool I keep getting the message: Unable to execute NQC. Check your installation. I'm running Windows 98. To (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC and Fixed Point Values
|
|
My recent project, with NQC, has started to demand calculations with fractional numbers. In an effort to do this, I have quickly come to know the sorted world of floating points, BCDs, 1 – 2 s complement etc. I realize the only way to go about all (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
It's me again with some improvements for an "Electrical Data Link between 2 RCX". In the current version I changed the default condition of the link to "high" (in the transmitter: OFF(OUT_B)) so that the receiver has a 1 at its sensor input. So, you (...) (24 years ago, 17-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
