Subject:
|
Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:52:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4682 times
|
| |
|
|
Well, I certainly have been thinking about this myself. I am planning on
getting an account on sourceforge and volunteering for development...
however, I would not be able to take a leading role in administration. I
sure hope someone can take up this role. Per my other posts, I think there
are things to be done; interesting projects to try; etc...
I remember reading Luis Villa's post. Actually, I backed away from trying
any kernel changes because of this.
I posted the proposal for tm_program_running just to see how many people
would respond... to see who is actively involved or interested. 8-)
BTW, Ed, I don't believe the lack of activity is because of the size of the
project... at least from my perspective... it is a very interesting project.
I think people have a tendency to sway back and forth between various
interests. I know I do.
- Joe -> (off to sourceforge)
"Mark Meytin" <mark@meytin.com> wrote in message
news:3C9A11BB.4090308@meytin.com...
> I think the main problem with legOS right now is lack of
> consistent maintenance. As Luis Villa noted back in February,
> he can no longer devote enough time to legOS to support the
> upkeep. He also made a call for new volunteers, and listed
> what's required of one (not that much really). I think
> that once a person will come forward, a lot of the things
> that you mention will be resolved. Unfortunately, I am not
> in the position right now to do it - anyone else is
> willing to step forward?
>
> -M-
>
> Ed Manlove wrote:
<snip>
> >
> > What I am wandering (or babeling) about is the numerous bug reports and
> > enhancements reported on LUGNET where most of the activity is and very
> > little within the bug tracking system on SourceForge. Are there any
> > particular reasons for this? Do people find it difficult to get to the
> > legOS project on SourceForge? Do people find it difficult to use
> > SourceForge? Are people just reluctant to submitt bugs? Without a new
> > feature or enhancements tracking system do people not submitt ideas • under
> > SourceForge bug tracking system or other database? Is there a • reluctance
> > due to the fact that one wants input about their ideas and little is • given?
> > And once input is given is the next step(s) illusive? Do we need to • build a
> > better consinous building mechanism? Or does recording and tracking • various
> > bugs and features seem like overkill for the (relatively small - my
> > words)legOS project?
> >
> > So many questions! A couple of things which I would like to propose • (and am
> > willing to work on) is first some enhancements to the bug tracking • database
> > on SourceForge and second possibly mirroring the bug submission on • LUGNET.
> > I am putting together some ideas for the enhancements and will present • them
> > here. And I am interested to hear peoples thoughts about why we should
> > store and track bugs and features if at all and what would help to
> > facilitate this more!
> >
> > Ed
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
