Subject:
|
Re: Very strange problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 May 2000 19:05:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1376 times
|
| |
|
|
> <snip lots of monkey talk :) >
>
> > The individuals recieve fitness. We will have a tailing wheel conncected
> > to a rotation sensor to register movement.
>
> Distance of movement or consistency (i.e. always forward) or both for
> fitness?
Probably movement since it is easier. Our fitness function may have to
change once we see the result though. GA tends to give you individuals
that cheat every chance they get :).
> Sounds really cool. Good luck. I'm actually also very interested in the
> mechanical design- please make sure to share pictures with all of us :)
It will be found at http://www.dd.chalmers.se/~f96tobe/AA/. Right now we
have our Braitenberg vehicle and our Sumo robot there.
Tobias
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Very strange problems
|
| (...) Neural nets do similar things. Our class had some very interesting cheaters. I actually thought the students learned as much from watching their robots cheat as they did from any other single component, since figuring out the "cheating" forced (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Very strange problems
|
| (...) Redundancy is good :) (...) Good. It's generally solid, but can cause some issues from time to time. <snip lots of monkey talk :) > (...) Distance of movement or consistency (i.e. always forward) or both for fitness? Sounds really cool. Good (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
