 | | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
|
(...) I think that the datalogging area is just a special limited firmware array, but , IIRC, since it mentions nowhere that you have to remember to keep the datalog size into account. Try using the opcodes, and see what works. Andy -- See my Visual (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
|
(...) It does answer my question, but I was thinking that a feature like that would be more memory efficient. It seems to me (knowing very little of programmimg small devices) that there are special OP codes (looking at Keokea Proudfoot's RCX (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | cvs changes
|
|
Hi, I checked into the CVS repository some changes today. They include: A) a fix to util/dll-src/Makefile to reference ../../kernel/lnp.c, so a symbolic link or copy is not required. B) small changes to various makefiles to get c++ support working (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: c++
|
|
Hi, Sorry that I've been AWOL! Attached is a set of patches you can apply to the 2.5 distribution to clean up most of the make process. You will still have to correctly specify the TOOLPREFIX in Makefile.common, or via the make command line. You can (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
|
There's no need to implement this because Java allows you to create an array and store as much data as you want in it. You have a lot more power by using an array over the NQC feature, which I believe is limited to something like 100 numbers. Hope (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | RcxCC (again)
|
|
I'm embarassed to admit that I've posted yet another revised version of RcxCC to my website. Version 3.2.9.0 further extends the graphing ability I added in over the course of the two previous revisions. In this release it is possible to display a (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RcxCC Font problem
|
|
First, thanks a lot to continue the developpment of RcxCC. Your program is great ! I have a little problem with your program. I made a font for my own purpose (small, readable, all characters different). This font is not display correctly in your (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Another new RcxCC version
|
|
hi John, (...) RCXcc / reset worked fine, that's a lot more extended then the orginal RCXcc ! (...) At the moment I'm building such an implementation, the main program is a kind of oscilloscope and the launched application is a controler for a (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Another new RcxCC version
|
|
(...) I'm guessing the problem with templates is a registry problem. If you are comfortable with editing your registry you might check for a Templates key under HKEY_CURRENT_USER\So...CC\version 3.2\. If that key exists but it contains no string (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | c++
|
|
Is c++ supported in legOs2.5 ? We've been unable to compile even the demos! (I already posted about that) Please give us a voice! thanks Ciao, Vittorio (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Another new RcxCC version
|
|
hi John, looks good, but I can't use it yet. The main problem I have is that I can't see my templates. At once I found them, a window 10 pixels win width and 25 pixels in height, and I can't get it bigger. Am I doing something wrong ? Very nice (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Trouble loading programs
|
|
Hi all, I'm new to legos and am having some problems loading programs. I have searched the news pages for my particular error and there are some that are close but not exactly. I hope someone can help because I am currently "dead in the water". Here (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead RCX
|
|
(...) Thanks for the response. I tried bending the tabs to ensure they were making contact with the batteries. That didn't work, so I opened the case and confirmed that the 9V (actually 9.6V) was reaching the voltage regulator. It was, so I know (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Another new RcxCC version
|
|
Rather than postpone this upload until I'm completely done with the feature, I decided to make it available for anyone interested since I think it is turning out to be very nice. I've just posted version 3.2.7.3 of RcxCC (with the latest source) to (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead RCX
|
|
(...) Hi Matthias, normally I'd call LEGO service. The only thing I can think of is that maybe the power connection is lost. That shouldn't happen to an unopened RCX, but who knows. The power connection from the batteries to the mainboard is by (...) (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead RCX
|
|
(...) It's completely and utterly dead. Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (23 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with Lejos 1.0.0Beta3
|
|
Are you sure the port you IR tower is connected to is really com2? You might try connecting to com1, and then just use lejosfirndl . For me, this works - it tries com1, and then downloads. (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead RCX
|
|
Completely dead? no response of any kind when you push the ON/OFF button? I ask because if battery power is off for too long, the firmware evaporates and the RCX is pretty non -responsive. But the LCD is not blank. If this is the case, download the (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Floating ponts ??
|
|
(...) Exceptions to the 0th law: You are manipulating and comparing floating-point values you know are integers with a magnitude less than a million or two. You are manipulating and comparing values you know are integer multiples of some power of (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Floating ponts ??
|
|
Hi there! (...) 0th law of computer science: NEVER use == on floats; it simply doesn't work as expected. In most cases a value cannot be exactly represented as a float variable; so MOST comparisons for equality WILL fail. (this is NOT an issue of (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
