Subject:
|
RE: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:41:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
741 times
|
| |
|
|
In message <000001bf1a4c$b8bb9100$0500000a@pro150>
"Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote:
> I've read that the end where the power connector was is "thinner" which
> is OK since the connector was mounted on the component side and would have
> added to the hight required. The "smoothing caps" could be eliminated
> in a battery only design, which would make that end of things thinner too.
I don't think so - it looks the same shape as the pictures of RIS 1.0 RCXs
I've seen. I doubt they would change the external shape as it would cause
problems with plans in expansion kits etc. I expect there's just a lot of
empty space inside.
--
Kevin Bracey, Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology plc Tel: +44 (0) 1223 518566
645 Newmarket Road Fax: +44 (0) 1223 518526
Cambridge, CB5 8PB, United Kingdom WWW: http://www.acorn.co.uk/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
| (...) I've read that the end where the power connector was is "thinner" which is OK since the connector was mounted on the component side and would have added to the hight required. The "smoothing caps" could be eliminated in a battery only design, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
