Subject:
|
Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 1999 00:15:57 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ray Kelm <rhk@newimage&NoMoreSpam&.com>
|
Viewed:
|
896 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Speed wrote:
>
> Laurentino Martins wrote:
> >
> > I think this approach opens new possibilities and retaining the
> > best of both worlds. This is what we need! =:-D
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Is it just me, or is this starting to sound alot like
> LegOS? :)
>
> -Paul (pspeed@progeeks.com)
Why not implement an interpreter that is linked with LegOS?
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think...
|
| (...) Whatever interpreter is decided on, an OS will be required. Depending on the requirements of that interpreter, particularly in terms of memory allocation (and garbage collection) and threading support, LegOS may be a fine base for it. On the (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
