Subject:
|
Re: Programming RCX?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:42:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
991 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Joel Shafer writes:
> At 05:10 PM 4/22/99 +0000, Dennis Clark wrote:
> >
> > Mechanical = 5 X programming time! I suck in Lego engineering! Boy do
> > I end up with some "Rube Goldberg" layouts! I am in awe of the Lego
> > Technic engineers!
> I second that. I've had my RIS kit all year and have spend 90% of my time
> trying to come up with good mechanical designs that are compact, good
> looking, and don't fall apart. Before I bought the RIS, I thought of
> myself as being mechanically enabled. I'm also in awe of the technic
> engineers. I purchased the technics front end loader and was amazed to see
> 4 wheel drive, steering, and pneumatics all assembled into a cool realistic
> model instead of some Goldberg contraption.
I just got that model myself. I'm one hour into the construction and
happily anticipating the next 6 hours that will be needed to finish it!
Now I'm looking at the tow truck and saying, "hmmm". Expensive, but man
are they cool!
have fun!
DLC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Programming RCX?
|
| (...) I second that. I've had my RIS kit all year and have spend 90% of my time trying to come up with good mechanical designs that are compact, good looking, and don't fall apart. Before I bought the RIS, I thought of myself as being mechanically (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
