Subject:
|
Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:18:28 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
stephen p spackman <stephen@acm*AntiSpam*.org>
|
Viewed:
|
2602 times
|
| |
|
|
Kekoa Proudfoot wrote:
>
> > I would agree that there is strong enough division between the three
> > following topics to warrent seperate fora:
> >
> > -- "Pure" Lego robotics: using only Real Lego hardware, although including
> > using alternate development environments. This is Mindstorms (etc.) from
> > a user level.
> > -- Mindstorms reverse engineering/metadevelopment: figuring out the
> > internals, and building tools for others to use.
> > -- Custom Lego robotics: homebrew and other commercial systems that
> > interface with Lego. This is Lego robotics from a hardware-hacker's
> > viewpoint. And the 'non-purist' approach puts a different attitude and
> > feel to the whole thing. Someone posted to the list just a bit ago
> > saying that they hoped the excitement over Mindstorms would die down
> > soon because they wanted to talk about other possiblities. While that's
> > certainly an ok view to have, a lot of us (most of us?) feel
> > differently.
>
> My only concern is that there is not enough traffic to warrant a split.
>
> Reverse engineering will die down after a few more months - the firmware is
> 95% finished as far as I'm concerned, with only the ROM and new firmware
> really remaining - when these are done, traffic on these topics will die
> down substantially. Posts relating to custom Lego robotics have always
> seemed to be in a sideband - interesting, but never a major talking point.
> I'm sure that purists can withstand the wincing when hearing about the
> occasional slicing and dicing of a Lego part. I even think occasional
> threads discussing using another controller (Handy Board or Stamp, say)
> with Lego bricks are fine, since I can't imagine them ever taking over the
> focus of the list/newsgroup. (If they do, however, that might warrant a
> split.)
Hear, hear.
While the proposed split is reasonable, shortly all the reverse
engineering stuff will be on web pages, rather than a voluminous ongoing
discussion, and hopefully the metatraffic will shortly die down too.
stephen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
| I am not sure if this is the right thread, or the only thread on the subject, but it seems close to what I have to say. Although the "gateway" is now here, and I *NOT* (repeat not) advocating the removal, I still want to say my two pickles. Firstly, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
| (...) My only concern is that there is not enough traffic to warrant a split. Reverse engineering will die down after a few more months - the firmware is 95% finished as far as I'm concerned, with only the ROM and new firmware really remaining - (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
